Skip to content

Words on the Page

a freelance writing resource.

Menu
  • Blogs Worth Reading
  • Courses
  • Ebooks
  • Free Writers Worth eBook
  • Guest Posting Guidelines
  • Home
  • Marketing 365
  • Monthly Assessment
Menu

Author: lwidmer

Terseness on the Edge of Town

Posted on July 19, 2011 by lwidmer

Yesterday was nice and busy. I got in a large chunk of an annual project, and I made decent headway on it. It’s a huge document, and the client is hoping to have things proofed and formatted by August 15th. I hope that’s possible. In the past, things have taken much longer (it’s really big)….

Read more

Guest Post: Now What?

Posted on July 18, 2011 by lwidmer

Remember that little Twitter tweetup Anne Wayman and I hosted a few weeks back? Turns out there are more great ideas coming from those 140-character conversations than I ever expected. Today’s post is no exception. Andrea Altenburg, technical writer extraordinaire, has provided a superb primer for writers new to the profession. She’s graciously agreed to…

Read more

Beautiful Day

Posted on July 15, 2011 by lwidmer

Forgive me now – I’m working on about 5 1/2 hours of sleep. If I ramble more than usual it’s because I’ve nodded off mid-sentence. The U2 concert last night, in a word, was magnificent. Truly. Only one other time have I left a concert feeling deeply moved, and that was Santana, whom you might…

Read more

Working With PR

Posted on July 14, 2011 by lwidmer

Busy day again, amen. I finished a large project (just a section – more on the way), and got some smaller stuff accomplished. I worked on a personal project, then it was off to the pool to relax. Finally. I feel like I’ve been running through my week. It’s going to get worse before it…

Read more

Finding Work Through Prompts

Posted on July 13, 2011 by lwidmer

Check out Wade Finnegan’s Quality Writing blog: he’s interviewed yours truly. Thanks, Wade! Yesterday was nuts. I spent the morning on a large project, then headed off to get some medical tests done. A communications foul-up had me taking a different test than the one I’d scheduled. It also meant my quick 45-minute trip turned…

Read more

Guest Post: Following Your Muse

Posted on July 12, 2011 by lwidmer

I love when random conversations evolve into a learning experience. Such was the case last week when Anne Wayman and I hosted our second Twitter tweetup (#writingsquared if you want to read). Anne Maclachlan joined the conversation, and she said something that intrigued me. In an email conversation afterward, she told me she was “an…

Read more

Invoicing and Butt Kicking

Posted on July 11, 2011 by lwidmer

I was reading a post over on Anne Wayman’s site on preparing invoices. One of the commenters posed the predicament of collection. He wondered aloud (and then said what he’d do) how one goes about collecting. While I love his response: “…kick his butt” it has some impractical applications in the real world. Figuratively, though,…

Read more

Better Client Contact

Posted on July 8, 2011 by lwidmer

It rained yesterday. Just a short rain – less than an hour – but I was thrilled to see it. I can’t remember the last real rain we had. Wait – yes I do. End of May. Wow. Really? I spent the morning on a tricky client project. Usually they’re easy, but this one had…

Read more

Time Management for the Unorganized

Posted on July 7, 2011 by lwidmer

Ah, timing is everything. I asked Anne Wayman to do another Twitter tweetup yesterday only to find out seconds before that I’d chosen the very time our President was tweeting. Nuts. I don’t know why I thought he was tweeting at 11:30. That time was stuck in my head. Oh well. Thanks to those of…

Read more

Learning to Trust Your Gut

Posted on July 6, 2011 by lwidmer

If you’re around at 2 pm ET/11 am PT today, meet up with Anne Wayman and me for the #writingsquared tweetup! Bring questions and advice – all are welcome. Interesting day yesterday. Got a small project done, managed to stay awake long enough to get an estimate back to a client on a big project,…

Read more
  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 147
  • 148
  • 149
  • 150
  • 151
  • 152
  • 153
  • …
  • 267
  • Next
  1. Devon Ellington Avatar
    Devon Ellington
    July 6, 2011

    I'm highly suspicious of people who talk about the need to follow directions/submission guidelines in their ads.

    Any professional writer does that.

    If you feel the need to say it, that means you're not targeting professionals. Don't say it and toss the ones who don't do it.

    Also, the whole registering for considering — no. Either you're hiring me or you want me as an audience member. Not both.

    Reply
  2. Wendy Avatar
    Wendy
    July 6, 2011

    I don't like the email address, it looks too much like a personal one. Using Gmail doesn't bother me too much, but throwing in the 916 part just looks odd to me. If it was the company name or website name it would probably would look better.

    As it is, it makes me think of a Nigerian scam.

    Reply
  3. Mama Stick Avatar
    Mama Stick
    July 6, 2011

    Lori, first off: Thank you for commenting on my post about this.

    Second: My personal email has been disabled by Google because of the scammer. She resent the emails- if you replied Lori you may have received an email from a snarky responder 'Andy'.

    I replied back with a link to what 'Jessica' did…woke up to a disabled email.

    Watch out for the scammers, guys.

    Reply
  4. Jenn Mattern Avatar
    Jenn Mattern
    July 6, 2011

    Very weird case there Lori. Definitely reeks of a possible phishing scam with the sign-up requirement with no commitment. Just strange.

    Reply
  5. Lori Avatar
    Lori
    July 6, 2011

    Devon, exactly. Anyone who doesn't ask for samples, resumes, or any form of proof that you can write sends up a red flag. Moreover, stupid requirements that have zero to do with the job is another.

    Wendy, likewise. I don't normally mind Google (I use it), but as you suggested, the 916 didn't make sense.

    MamaStick (I won't use your real name unless you say it's okay), thanks for commenting. I had wondered if that email (and yes, I got one, too) didn't cause grief with email accounts. I tried to respond to you via that and my Verizon account wouldn't let any of it through. I did get that response from "Andy" – I tend to ignore people who try to rally you to the cause, then ask you to vote in the upcoming election (What the HELL was that about?)…

    Jenn, I suspect it is a phishing scam. That it poses as a job offer is weird. Honestly, the first red flag went up when I saw the pay rate. No one offers that on Craig's List! LOL

    Reply
  6. Paula Avatar
    Paula
    July 6, 2011

    Sad when a new red flag for a writer ripoff is an ad listing a decent pay rate.

    Thankfully I haven't come across anything like this. (How are they managing to disable e-mail, anyway?)

    One thing I've encountered twice lately are the editors who say, "We're highly formatted so you MUST follow our guidelines closely," and expect you to include special things they never mentioned. Or if they mentioned it, they didn't explain it.

    I'm all about trying to match each client's style as closely as I can, but if you say "you MUST include XYZ for each example" and then don't explain what the term XYZ means, don't snap when the writer asks what you mean! Very recently I had an editor do just that. The terse reply was, "It was in your assignment letter." Um…no, it wasn't. It also wasn't mentioned in your FAQ, guidelines, contract, or any e-mails.

    Receiving no clarification, I sent in what I had with a note saying I hope that I managed to unknowingly include the XYZ by following the examples I was given.

    In short: Editors/clients who demand perfection from their contributors ought to demand it of themselves, too.

    Reply
  7. Devon Ellington Avatar
    Devon Ellington
    July 6, 2011

    Paula,

    Yep, been there. Nothing like following the guidelines to the letter and getting back a rude response saying, "obviously you didn't read the guidelines because of x, y, z". Uh, when a, b, c were listed and x, y, z were not — YOU're the asshole, not me! 😉 (meaning, of course, the "editor" not Paula, who is lovely).

    Reply
  8. Mama Stick Avatar
    Mama Stick
    July 6, 2011

    It's okay, I'm Julie. Changed my username on this account. I keep forgetting that the profile shows in all of my blogs.

    I wish Google would allow the profile name to be set for each blog, 1 to 1.

    Reply
  9. Ashley Avatar
    Ashley
    July 6, 2011

    There are so many red flags in that second email. The thing that gets me the most is how condescending it is. If you think I'm stupid, then why would you want to hire me?

    Good call, Lori, to pass on this one. I'm glad you didn't waste any more of your time!

    Reply
  10. Lori Avatar
    Lori
    July 6, 2011

    Julie, glad you posted. 🙂 I agree – if Google allowed that, it would be so much easier!

    Paula, that is SO frustrating! I agree. If you want me to follow your rules, then follow your own.

    Ashley, it was waving on the original post, but I wanted to see what was up. I knew going in this was how it would end, but hey, all in the name of research, right? 🙂

    Paula is lovely, isn't she? And Devon, the temptation to say that very thing – oh, I could have been in such trouble if I'd acted on it! LOL

    Reply
  11. Meryl K. Evans Avatar
    Meryl K. Evans
    July 6, 2011

    Ha! I published a similar article today. GMTA! Yes, I've gotten several suspicious types of emails recently and it prompted me to write the article.

    If you walk away with nothing, it's this: Don't be afraid to ask questions in fear of losing the opportunity. Better than getting stuck in a bad situation and working out of it.

    Reply
  12. Lori Avatar
    Lori
    July 7, 2011

    Meryl, great minds indeed. 🙂 Your point is spot on – ask questions. Only those clients who aren't really clients would get upset over questions. No loss there!

    Reply
  13. Paula Avatar
    Paula
    July 7, 2011

    Lori & Devon, you two have got me blushing now…

    Turns out the editor had sent the info, just in a different attachment. Semantics: when she said "assignment letter" I thought she meant the e-mail in which she officially assigned the work. She meant the "Article Assignment Sheet" that had been attached. I'd looked that over but was so tired from working all day on another thing for the same editor that I didn't even see the explanation of the term when I was looking straight at it. A good night's sleep and a clear perspective and I now owe the editor an apology. (Granted, she could have been clearer about which of the 6 or so documents she'd sent contained the info.) It was in a chart, and turns out I did in fact magically incorporate the XYZs without realizing it. (FYI: Any decent writer would have. The terms I needed to include were different tenses of the main topic.)

    Reply
© 2026 Words on the Page | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme