<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Client Red Flags Every Freelancer Needs to Know	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wordsonpageblog.com/2024/02/client-red-flags-every-freelancer-needs-to-know.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wordsonpageblog.com/2024/02/client-red-flags-every-freelancer-needs-to-know.html</link>
	<description>a freelance writing resource.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 17:22:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Lori		</title>
		<link>https://wordsonpageblog.com/2024/02/client-red-flags-every-freelancer-needs-to-know.html#comment-29055</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lori]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 17:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://wordsonpageblog.com/?p=8706#comment-29055</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://wordsonpageblog.com/2024/02/client-red-flags-every-freelancer-needs-to-know.html#comment-28397&quot;&gt;Randy B Hecht&lt;/a&gt;.

Excellent breakdown, my friend! 

You COULD earn that much, but hey, who are we to tell you what that entails?

The more disturbing trend these days involves the &quot;full-time freelancer needed&quot; bullshit. This is a company that needs you present for 40 hours a week -- their stated hours, not yours. And guess what? They&#039;ll pay you employee wages. But no benefits. That, friends, is called illegal.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://wordsonpageblog.com/2024/02/client-red-flags-every-freelancer-needs-to-know.html#comment-28397">Randy B Hecht</a>.</p>
<p>Excellent breakdown, my friend! </p>
<p>You COULD earn that much, but hey, who are we to tell you what that entails?</p>
<p>The more disturbing trend these days involves the &#8220;full-time freelancer needed&#8221; bullshit. This is a company that needs you present for 40 hours a week &#8212; their stated hours, not yours. And guess what? They&#8217;ll pay you employee wages. But no benefits. That, friends, is called illegal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Randy B Hecht		</title>
		<link>https://wordsonpageblog.com/2024/02/client-red-flags-every-freelancer-needs-to-know.html#comment-28397</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randy B Hecht]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2024 00:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://wordsonpageblog.com/?p=8706#comment-28397</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My favorite is a recurring theme that comes up on Upwork in particular, though not exclusively: It&#039;s the line that tells you how much you &quot;can&quot; earn as one of their &quot;top&quot; freelancers.  

There may be an hourly or per-piece rate attached to these claims. 

&quot;The rate for this work is $50/hour, which translates to a six-figure income for our top writers.&quot; This starts out as really easy math, because $100,000÷$50=2000 hours. So you need to work 2000 hours a year to hit $100,000 at that rate. Let&#039;s say you can reasonably expect to work 48 weeks a year, which allows two weeks for vacation and two weeks for holidays, sick days, and personal days.  That means you have to have 41.66 income-producing hours every week for each of those 48 weeks to hit 2000 hours and $100,000. Not 41.66 work hours a week, but 41.66 income-producing hours per week, and then you pile admin, invoicing/billing, client contact, marketing, email, and so forth on top of that. It&#039;s because of all that other stuff related to running a business that the customary calculation gives full-time freelancers 1400 working hours a year, and 1400 hours x $50/hour brings you to $70,000 a year. In other words, the &quot;can earn&quot; number assumes that you&#039;re putting in a ton of overtime. 

&quot;We pay a flat rate of $25 for 350-word posts, which works out to a rate of $75/hour for our best freelancers.&quot; The math here is even easier. They&#039;re telling you that their &quot;best freelancers&quot; speed-dial through 1,050 words an hour, because you can&#039;t turn a $25/post rate into a $75/hour rate unless you&#039;re cranking out three of those puppies an hour. And hey, most of us can do that in a pinch, for a short term: 1,050 words in an hour isn&#039;t beyond the realm of possibility if you already know the topic and have the information at hand. But can you sustain that over the course of a business day? Can you write 21 350-word posts during a single workday to pocket $525 for the day&#039;s work? If you can&#039;t, or if the client can&#039;t provide that volume of work, then the $75/hour rate is meaningless in addition to being fantasy. 

For the most part, when you see these fanciful claims, your best bet is to kick the &quot;can&quot; to the curb.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite is a recurring theme that comes up on Upwork in particular, though not exclusively: It&#8217;s the line that tells you how much you &#8220;can&#8221; earn as one of their &#8220;top&#8221; freelancers.  </p>
<p>There may be an hourly or per-piece rate attached to these claims. </p>
<p>&#8220;The rate for this work is $50/hour, which translates to a six-figure income for our top writers.&#8221; This starts out as really easy math, because $100,000÷$50=2000 hours. So you need to work 2000 hours a year to hit $100,000 at that rate. Let&#8217;s say you can reasonably expect to work 48 weeks a year, which allows two weeks for vacation and two weeks for holidays, sick days, and personal days.  That means you have to have 41.66 income-producing hours every week for each of those 48 weeks to hit 2000 hours and $100,000. Not 41.66 work hours a week, but 41.66 income-producing hours per week, and then you pile admin, invoicing/billing, client contact, marketing, email, and so forth on top of that. It&#8217;s because of all that other stuff related to running a business that the customary calculation gives full-time freelancers 1400 working hours a year, and 1400 hours x $50/hour brings you to $70,000 a year. In other words, the &#8220;can earn&#8221; number assumes that you&#8217;re putting in a ton of overtime. </p>
<p>&#8220;We pay a flat rate of $25 for 350-word posts, which works out to a rate of $75/hour for our best freelancers.&#8221; The math here is even easier. They&#8217;re telling you that their &#8220;best freelancers&#8221; speed-dial through 1,050 words an hour, because you can&#8217;t turn a $25/post rate into a $75/hour rate unless you&#8217;re cranking out three of those puppies an hour. And hey, most of us can do that in a pinch, for a short term: 1,050 words in an hour isn&#8217;t beyond the realm of possibility if you already know the topic and have the information at hand. But can you sustain that over the course of a business day? Can you write 21 350-word posts during a single workday to pocket $525 for the day&#8217;s work? If you can&#8217;t, or if the client can&#8217;t provide that volume of work, then the $75/hour rate is meaningless in addition to being fantasy. </p>
<p>For the most part, when you see these fanciful claims, your best bet is to kick the &#8220;can&#8221; to the curb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
