<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Monday Muse: 6 Warning Signs of a Bad Client/Freelance Writer Match	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wordsonpageblog.com/2016/10/monday-musings-6-warning-signs-of-a-bad-clientfreelance-writer-match.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wordsonpageblog.com/2016/10/monday-musings-6-warning-signs-of-a-bad-clientfreelance-writer-match.html</link>
	<description>a freelance writing resource.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2016 14:24:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: lwidmer		</title>
		<link>https://wordsonpageblog.com/2016/10/monday-musings-6-warning-signs-of-a-bad-clientfreelance-writer-match.html#comment-15675</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lwidmer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2016 19:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordsonpageblog.com/?p=5351#comment-15675</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://wordsonpageblog.com/2016/10/monday-musings-6-warning-signs-of-a-bad-clientfreelance-writer-match.html#comment-15596&quot;&gt;Paula Hendrickson&lt;/a&gt;.

Paula, it&#039;s a shame when you do everything you can and the person&#039;s attitude gets in the way. Not much more you could have done, I don&#039;t imagine. I&#039;ve had editors like that -- luckily long ago. I wrote one article that took seven edits. No article needs seven edits. Two, maybe three. After that, it&#039;s not really the writer, but the editor. Either they&#039;ve not made the assignment clear or they can&#039;t stop touching the content.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://wordsonpageblog.com/2016/10/monday-musings-6-warning-signs-of-a-bad-clientfreelance-writer-match.html#comment-15596">Paula Hendrickson</a>.</p>
<p>Paula, it&#8217;s a shame when you do everything you can and the person&#8217;s attitude gets in the way. Not much more you could have done, I don&#8217;t imagine. I&#8217;ve had editors like that &#8212; luckily long ago. I wrote one article that took seven edits. No article needs seven edits. Two, maybe three. After that, it&#8217;s not really the writer, but the editor. Either they&#8217;ve not made the assignment clear or they can&#8217;t stop touching the content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Paula Hendrickson		</title>
		<link>https://wordsonpageblog.com/2016/10/monday-musings-6-warning-signs-of-a-bad-clientfreelance-writer-match.html#comment-15596</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paula Hendrickson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2016 15:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordsonpageblog.com/?p=5351#comment-15596</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Lucky I wasn&#039;t drinking my tea when reading the &quot;temperature&quot; passage - I had flashbacks of last night&#039;s debate that set me into gales of laughter!

Seriously, though, I had a similar experience within the past year with a high-profile first-time client. It left such a bad taste in my mouth that I NEVER want to cross that so-called editor&#039;s path again. About eight years ago I had another experience when a new-to-me editor changed the scope so much that I had to re-write and find all new sources. Even after that she totally re-worked my copy to the point I didn&#039;t recognize it, and it was so bad 1) I wish my byline weren&#039;t attached, and 2) I can&#039;t use it as a clip.

Luckily, those were the exceptions. Most of the time my copy is run nearly verbatim.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lucky I wasn&#8217;t drinking my tea when reading the &#8220;temperature&#8221; passage &#8211; I had flashbacks of last night&#8217;s debate that set me into gales of laughter!</p>
<p>Seriously, though, I had a similar experience within the past year with a high-profile first-time client. It left such a bad taste in my mouth that I NEVER want to cross that so-called editor&#8217;s path again. About eight years ago I had another experience when a new-to-me editor changed the scope so much that I had to re-write and find all new sources. Even after that she totally re-worked my copy to the point I didn&#8217;t recognize it, and it was so bad 1) I wish my byline weren&#8217;t attached, and 2) I can&#8217;t use it as a clip.</p>
<p>Luckily, those were the exceptions. Most of the time my copy is run nearly verbatim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
