<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: When Safe Freelance Writing Isn&#8217;t Good Enough	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wordsonpageblog.com/2016/06/when-safe-freelance-writing-isnt-good.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wordsonpageblog.com/2016/06/when-safe-freelance-writing-isnt-good.html</link>
	<description>a freelance writing resource.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2016 18:05:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Lori Widmer		</title>
		<link>https://wordsonpageblog.com/2016/06/when-safe-freelance-writing-isnt-good.html#comment-15098</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lori Widmer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 12:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loriwidmer.com/wordsonpage/index.php/2016/06/when-safe-freelance-writing-isnt-good.html/#comment-15098</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Paula, it&#039;s true. I know some media outlets do publish them verbatim, others take bits of them for their front-of-the-book sections, but in general, they don&#039;t compel editors to want to use them. Though I will say the well-written ones do spark ideas. I&#039;ve used a number of them as springboards to articles, and thanks to the releases, I already have one source.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Totally agree on the conversational tone. You can do that and not sound so corporate, but still maintain your authoritative tone. It just takes the right writer. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paula, it&#39;s true. I know some media outlets do publish them verbatim, others take bits of them for their front-of-the-book sections, but in general, they don&#39;t compel editors to want to use them. Though I will say the well-written ones do spark ideas. I&#39;ve used a number of them as springboards to articles, and thanks to the releases, I already have one source.</p>
<p>Totally agree on the conversational tone. You can do that and not sound so corporate, but still maintain your authoritative tone. It just takes the right writer. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Paula Hendrickson		</title>
		<link>https://wordsonpageblog.com/2016/06/when-safe-freelance-writing-isnt-good.html#comment-15097</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paula Hendrickson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 20:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loriwidmer.com/wordsonpage/index.php/2016/06/when-safe-freelance-writing-isnt-good.html/#comment-15097</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Being on the receiving end of an endless stream of press releases, I can attest that anything that sounds like a press release is immediately ignored (by me). &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Conversational tones always beat corporate jargon.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being on the receiving end of an endless stream of press releases, I can attest that anything that sounds like a press release is immediately ignored (by me). </p>
<p>Conversational tones always beat corporate jargon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lori Widmer		</title>
		<link>https://wordsonpageblog.com/2016/06/when-safe-freelance-writing-isnt-good.html#comment-15096</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lori Widmer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 14:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loriwidmer.com/wordsonpage/index.php/2016/06/when-safe-freelance-writing-isnt-good.html/#comment-15096</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sometimes it just takes a nudge, doesn&#039;t it? You&#039;re so right about the conservative nature of our niche -- moving them toward something new can be painful for both sides.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I think you were smart to give them a &#034;transitional&#034; style. Helped ease the terror of something new, I&#039;d bet!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes it just takes a nudge, doesn&#39;t it? You&#39;re so right about the conservative nature of our niche &#8212; moving them toward something new can be painful for both sides.</p>
<p>I think you were smart to give them a &quot;transitional&quot; style. Helped ease the terror of something new, I&#39;d bet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Cathy Miller		</title>
		<link>https://wordsonpageblog.com/2016/06/when-safe-freelance-writing-isnt-good.html#comment-15095</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cathy Miller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 13:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loriwidmer.com/wordsonpage/index.php/2016/06/when-safe-freelance-writing-isnt-good.html/#comment-15095</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As you know all too well, Lori, our niche tends to be a tad conservative in communications. ;-) The healthcare industry is also. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I remember when I presented a different format to a healthcare client. Something other than the &#034;traditional&#034; white paper. The new format combines images and a presentation format (what Nancy Duarte calls a slidedoc). They loved it. It helped that they have been a long-time client so there is a good level of trust there.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you know all too well, Lori, our niche tends to be a tad conservative in communications. 😉 The healthcare industry is also. </p>
<p>I remember when I presented a different format to a healthcare client. Something other than the &quot;traditional&quot; white paper. The new format combines images and a presentation format (what Nancy Duarte calls a slidedoc). They loved it. It helped that they have been a long-time client so there is a good level of trust there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
