<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Monthly Assessment: February 2016	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wordsonpageblog.com/2016/03/monthly-assessment-february-2016.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wordsonpageblog.com/2016/03/monthly-assessment-february-2016.html</link>
	<description>a freelance writing resource.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2016 18:26:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Paula Hendrickson		</title>
		<link>https://wordsonpageblog.com/2016/03/monthly-assessment-february-2016.html#comment-14667</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paula Hendrickson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2016 16:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loriwidmer.com/wordsonpage/index.php/2016/03/monthly-assessment-february-2016.html/#comment-14667</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I was lucky that all of the sources for one multi-source article were available for one conference call instead of three separate calls. That helped. Two of them were single-source pieces. The other was three separate interviews, but a quick write.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I finally pulled together my receipts and stuff. This weekend I&#039;ll do a dry run with the tax software to see what I&#039;m missing. By the time I&#039;m done some of my invoices should be paid, which is good since I know I&#039;ll owe, too. I&#039;ve only had refunds twice, and I immediately applied them to the next year&#039;s taxes. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was lucky that all of the sources for one multi-source article were available for one conference call instead of three separate calls. That helped. Two of them were single-source pieces. The other was three separate interviews, but a quick write.</p>
<p>I finally pulled together my receipts and stuff. This weekend I&#39;ll do a dry run with the tax software to see what I&#39;m missing. By the time I&#39;m done some of my invoices should be paid, which is good since I know I&#39;ll owe, too. I&#39;ve only had refunds twice, and I immediately applied them to the next year&#39;s taxes. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lori Widmer		</title>
		<link>https://wordsonpageblog.com/2016/03/monthly-assessment-february-2016.html#comment-14666</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lori Widmer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2016 13:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loriwidmer.com/wordsonpage/index.php/2016/03/monthly-assessment-february-2016.html/#comment-14666</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Four articles. In one week. Wow, do you sleep?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Taxes. I can&#039;t stand it. I know I owe. I just don&#039;t want to know how much.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Four articles. In one week. Wow, do you sleep?</p>
<p>Taxes. I can&#39;t stand it. I know I owe. I just don&#39;t want to know how much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Paula Hendrickson		</title>
		<link>https://wordsonpageblog.com/2016/03/monthly-assessment-february-2016.html#comment-14665</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paula Hendrickson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 16:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loriwidmer.com/wordsonpage/index.php/2016/03/monthly-assessment-february-2016.html/#comment-14665</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s been a really busy month here, too, Lori. Last week I cranked out an article per day and had to take Friday easy to recuperate. Hoping to match that pace this week.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Queries/LOI - none that I recall&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Social Media - when I have time I should try to join a few Twitter chats and visit some of my LinkedIn groups.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Job Postings - replied to one which is a good fit for me, and within a couple days they asked for additional information. Haven&#039;t heard back yet. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Referrals - a photographer referred me to one of his clients, a guy who publishes glossy coffee table books about various cities. My city is next on his list. He said it&#039;s a mix of actual editorial copy and advertorial profiles of local business (the advertorials pay for the book). The rate isn&#039;t great, but I said I&#039;d be interested in doing some quick pieces that don&#039;t have much legwork, things I can fit between my higher paying assignments. Next day he tried assigning me three things that he needed right away - without any explanation of what he wanted other than the word counts. He said he wanted me to call to chat about the details. No. I don&#039;t have time to chat - not even if he were paying for the time. I said my schedule was too busy for a chat, but I prefer getting things in writing anyway so there&#039;s no confusion on my part. I asked how many sources he expected per article and what rights he was buying. I was floored when he replied with, &#034;I don&#039;t know.&#034; I sent a more detailed message...and never heard back. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;New Clients - none. But I did pick up two assignments from a new editor at one of the publications I write for. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Existing Clients - Turned in six articles for three regular clients. Only wrote two columns. Every time I turned something in another assignment or two popped up. Right now I&#039;m working on four articles for two of those clients.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Earnings - Counting actual invoices that have been paid, I was about $600 shy of my monthly goal. However, my current projects and soon-to-be-paid invoices total more than my monthly goal. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I also have an outstanding invoice for an article that appears to have been bumped back a few issues (or possibly axed). That publication&#039;s contract says it pays withing 45 days &#034;of acceptance,&#034; but doesn&#039;t define what &#034;acceptance&#034; is. It&#039;s a big check, so I don&#039;t want to risk pushing so hard they decide to scrap something instead of running it in a later issue. The thing is, this was for an editor who is horrible when it comes to communicating, so I&#039;m thinking no news is good news. It was one of the worst working experiences I&#039;ve ever had, simply because the editor was so indecisive. (She&#039;s the one who needed me to revise the article because two sources weren&#039;t expert enough, and another was a &#034;spokesperson&#034; and she wanted someone in R&#038;D. Not only had she approved my sources before I contacted them....she&#039;s the one who referred me to the sources she said weren&#039;t expert enough! You can&#039;t make this stuff up!) I know she won&#039;t update me as to the article&#039;s status, but if they aren&#039;t going to use it they need to pay the kill fee sooner than later. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bottom Line: I need to knock these four articles out this week so I can take a breather! Oh yeah, and get my taxes done. Ugh.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s been a really busy month here, too, Lori. Last week I cranked out an article per day and had to take Friday easy to recuperate. Hoping to match that pace this week.</p>
<p>Queries/LOI &#8211; none that I recall</p>
<p>Social Media &#8211; when I have time I should try to join a few Twitter chats and visit some of my LinkedIn groups.</p>
<p>Job Postings &#8211; replied to one which is a good fit for me, and within a couple days they asked for additional information. Haven&#39;t heard back yet. </p>
<p>Referrals &#8211; a photographer referred me to one of his clients, a guy who publishes glossy coffee table books about various cities. My city is next on his list. He said it&#39;s a mix of actual editorial copy and advertorial profiles of local business (the advertorials pay for the book). The rate isn&#39;t great, but I said I&#39;d be interested in doing some quick pieces that don&#39;t have much legwork, things I can fit between my higher paying assignments. Next day he tried assigning me three things that he needed right away &#8211; without any explanation of what he wanted other than the word counts. He said he wanted me to call to chat about the details. No. I don&#39;t have time to chat &#8211; not even if he were paying for the time. I said my schedule was too busy for a chat, but I prefer getting things in writing anyway so there&#39;s no confusion on my part. I asked how many sources he expected per article and what rights he was buying. I was floored when he replied with, &quot;I don&#39;t know.&quot; I sent a more detailed message&#8230;and never heard back. </p>
<p>New Clients &#8211; none. But I did pick up two assignments from a new editor at one of the publications I write for. </p>
<p>Existing Clients &#8211; Turned in six articles for three regular clients. Only wrote two columns. Every time I turned something in another assignment or two popped up. Right now I&#39;m working on four articles for two of those clients.  </p>
<p>Earnings &#8211; Counting actual invoices that have been paid, I was about $600 shy of my monthly goal. However, my current projects and soon-to-be-paid invoices total more than my monthly goal. </p>
<p>I also have an outstanding invoice for an article that appears to have been bumped back a few issues (or possibly axed). That publication&#39;s contract says it pays withing 45 days &quot;of acceptance,&quot; but doesn&#39;t define what &quot;acceptance&quot; is. It&#39;s a big check, so I don&#39;t want to risk pushing so hard they decide to scrap something instead of running it in a later issue. The thing is, this was for an editor who is horrible when it comes to communicating, so I&#39;m thinking no news is good news. It was one of the worst working experiences I&#39;ve ever had, simply because the editor was so indecisive. (She&#39;s the one who needed me to revise the article because two sources weren&#39;t expert enough, and another was a &quot;spokesperson&quot; and she wanted someone in R&amp;D. Not only had she approved my sources before I contacted them&#8230;.she&#39;s the one who referred me to the sources she said weren&#39;t expert enough! You can&#39;t make this stuff up!) I know she won&#39;t update me as to the article&#39;s status, but if they aren&#39;t going to use it they need to pay the kill fee sooner than later. </p>
<p>Bottom Line: I need to knock these four articles out this week so I can take a breather! Oh yeah, and get my taxes done. Ugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
