<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Content Mills: Deb Ng Responds	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wordsonpageblog.com/2009/10/content-mills-deb-ng-responds.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wordsonpageblog.com/2009/10/content-mills-deb-ng-responds.html</link>
	<description>a freelance writing resource.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 05:56:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://wordsonpageblog.com/2009/10/content-mills-deb-ng-responds.html#comment-4525</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 05:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loriwidmer.com/wordsonpage/index.php/2009/10/content-mills-deb-ng-responds.html/#comment-4525</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think places like Demand do hurt all of us. Sure people have the choice to work at subpar rates for a company like that. I just replied to a request to a similar site and told them they need to think in bigger dollars for me to consider. I&#039;m cool with them saying now.&lt;br /&gt;What I am not cool with is the thing no one is talking about. A great deal of revenue, specifically on the internet, is raised by ads. When companies like DS come in and flood the market with cheap articles for less, it lowers the cost of advertising. That&#039;s what these &#034;articles&#034; really are. When the cost of ads are low, publications pay less to their talent. That is where the real problem is.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think places like Demand do hurt all of us. Sure people have the choice to work at subpar rates for a company like that. I just replied to a request to a similar site and told them they need to think in bigger dollars for me to consider. I&#39;m cool with them saying now.<br />What I am not cool with is the thing no one is talking about. A great deal of revenue, specifically on the internet, is raised by ads. When companies like DS come in and flood the market with cheap articles for less, it lowers the cost of advertising. That&#39;s what these &quot;articles&quot; really are. When the cost of ads are low, publications pay less to their talent. That is where the real problem is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Carson		</title>
		<link>https://wordsonpageblog.com/2009/10/content-mills-deb-ng-responds.html#comment-3967</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loriwidmer.com/wordsonpage/index.php/2009/10/content-mills-deb-ng-responds.html/#comment-3967</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi.  If writing in lower paying market sectors makes one a laughingstock, I&#039;d hate to think of what I am!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Not only have I written countless cheap articles over the years, I&#039;m now running my own little content mill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While many might think that makes me either a fool or a devil, I can assure you that I&#039;m actually a relatively decent guy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I personally believe that lower paying jobs CAN be just fine and dandy for the right people under the right circumstances.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;These broad-brush criticisms of all low-rate work don&#039;t ring true to me.  I think they often stem from the idea that there is one best way to approach writing, when there&#039;s actually plenty of room to develop one&#039;s own business model.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One other thing...  I&#039;m seeing an &#034;eat your own&#034; thing happening in the comments to some of the recent controversy surrounding these issues.  People are going after the likes of Deb Ng and Kathy Kehrli in these comments, for instance.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While there&#039;s obviously some controversy regarding Deb&#039;s DS affiliation, she&#039;s done a lot for writers over the years and I think she deserves a little better.  Kathy&#039;s Irreverent Freelancer blog is a great watchdog site that looks out for the interests of freelancers.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&#039;ve known both of them for a few years and have been on the opposite side of them in these rate debates (and they were sticking up for the &#034;get more money&#034; sides of things, btw).  I&#039;ve grown to appreciate them both even when I disagree with them.  It really surprises me to see so many people (and I&#039;m not just referencing this thread) taking people like that to task.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi.  If writing in lower paying market sectors makes one a laughingstock, I&#39;d hate to think of what I am!</p>
<p>Not only have I written countless cheap articles over the years, I&#39;m now running my own little content mill.</p>
<p>While many might think that makes me either a fool or a devil, I can assure you that I&#39;m actually a relatively decent guy.</p>
<p>I personally believe that lower paying jobs CAN be just fine and dandy for the right people under the right circumstances.</p>
<p>These broad-brush criticisms of all low-rate work don&#39;t ring true to me.  I think they often stem from the idea that there is one best way to approach writing, when there&#39;s actually plenty of room to develop one&#39;s own business model.</p>
<p>One other thing&#8230;  I&#39;m seeing an &quot;eat your own&quot; thing happening in the comments to some of the recent controversy surrounding these issues.  People are going after the likes of Deb Ng and Kathy Kehrli in these comments, for instance.</p>
<p>While there&#39;s obviously some controversy regarding Deb&#39;s DS affiliation, she&#39;s done a lot for writers over the years and I think she deserves a little better.  Kathy&#39;s Irreverent Freelancer blog is a great watchdog site that looks out for the interests of freelancers.  </p>
<p>I&#39;ve known both of them for a few years and have been on the opposite side of them in these rate debates (and they were sticking up for the &quot;get more money&quot; sides of things, btw).  I&#39;ve grown to appreciate them both even when I disagree with them.  It really surprises me to see so many people (and I&#39;m not just referencing this thread) taking people like that to task.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: becky		</title>
		<link>https://wordsonpageblog.com/2009/10/content-mills-deb-ng-responds.html#comment-3956</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[becky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 03:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loriwidmer.com/wordsonpage/index.php/2009/10/content-mills-deb-ng-responds.html/#comment-3956</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think it&#039;s appropriate for me to list links here of what I&#039;ve seen over the last few months. There was a controversy over what a FWJ reader had posted on his own blog, and Deb responded on hers. Then there was the WAHM board back &#038; forth stuff. And some of the posts on FWJ have been Deb defending her choices over and over again. I realize that she&#039;s frustrated with the criticisms. I would be, too. I get that. But at some point, Deb, I really hope you just own your choices, stop trying to defend yourself so much, and just get back to helping people. You are always going to have critics. We all do.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My perceptions might be entirely wrong. But they are what *I* have felt is coming through on Deb&#039;s posts. This almost desperate need for approval. And believe me, I know that trap (too well - it has paralyzed much of my personal blogging). I want people to like me. I don&#039;t like controversy (and hadn&#039;t meant to cause any by my comments, honestly). It has been a little tough to read some of the posts from Deb. And I haven&#039;t given my feedback on the site because I don&#039;t want to be skewered for just stating how *I* feel right now. So I&#039;ve just stepped away, with plans to check in every now &#038; then and see how things are going.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I think FWJ can help writers, just like I think Lori helps people here. The two sites serve different audiences and I truly think there&#039;s plenty of room for everyone.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And Lori, if you feel you need to kill this because it would just continue to stir things up, I am totally okay with that. I wasn&#039;t sure if I should respond and if you feel it&#039;s going to make things worse, I totally understand. See you on the flip side of the weekend!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t think it&#39;s appropriate for me to list links here of what I&#39;ve seen over the last few months. There was a controversy over what a FWJ reader had posted on his own blog, and Deb responded on hers. Then there was the WAHM board back &amp; forth stuff. And some of the posts on FWJ have been Deb defending her choices over and over again. I realize that she&#39;s frustrated with the criticisms. I would be, too. I get that. But at some point, Deb, I really hope you just own your choices, stop trying to defend yourself so much, and just get back to helping people. You are always going to have critics. We all do.</p>
<p>My perceptions might be entirely wrong. But they are what *I* have felt is coming through on Deb&#39;s posts. This almost desperate need for approval. And believe me, I know that trap (too well &#8211; it has paralyzed much of my personal blogging). I want people to like me. I don&#39;t like controversy (and hadn&#39;t meant to cause any by my comments, honestly). It has been a little tough to read some of the posts from Deb. And I haven&#39;t given my feedback on the site because I don&#39;t want to be skewered for just stating how *I* feel right now. So I&#39;ve just stepped away, with plans to check in every now &amp; then and see how things are going.</p>
<p>I think FWJ can help writers, just like I think Lori helps people here. The two sites serve different audiences and I truly think there&#39;s plenty of room for everyone.</p>
<p>And Lori, if you feel you need to kill this because it would just continue to stir things up, I am totally okay with that. I wasn&#39;t sure if I should respond and if you feel it&#39;s going to make things worse, I totally understand. See you on the flip side of the weekend!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://wordsonpageblog.com/2009/10/content-mills-deb-ng-responds.html#comment-3953</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loriwidmer.com/wordsonpage/index.php/2009/10/content-mills-deb-ng-responds.html/#comment-3953</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Interesting how no one has anything to say anymore when Angela Hoy is called out for (and proven to be) being a liar.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting how no one has anything to say anymore when Angela Hoy is called out for (and proven to be) being a liar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Julie Fletcher		</title>
		<link>https://wordsonpageblog.com/2009/10/content-mills-deb-ng-responds.html#comment-3939</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julie Fletcher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loriwidmer.com/wordsonpage/index.php/2009/10/content-mills-deb-ng-responds.html/#comment-3939</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I would like to add: Angela Hoy may have used emails from DS writers, but she did not use the ones that were very positive. I wrote her and did not mention FWJ, Deb, or anyone else. I was a subscriber to Writer&#039;s Weekly, though I won&#039;t be visiting there again. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This was my email- my average per hour has changed since my husband has a new job. It&#039;s far too hard to try to keep up the rate of speed now.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hi Angela,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I write for Demand Studios. Typically it takes me about an hour to&lt;br /&gt;write 2 to 3 How To articles. I&#039;ve recently switched to Fact Sheets&lt;br /&gt;and can finish 4 in an hour if I have no distractions. When I&#039;m&lt;br /&gt;feeling frisky I can get 20 of either format out in one day. (lots of&lt;br /&gt;coffee for that!)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It averages out to around $30 an hour for me.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Demand pays me promptly via Paypal, usually about 6 PM EST. My very&lt;br /&gt;first payment was later than that, it came in at 9 PM EST, which was&lt;br /&gt;fine with me since DS is located on the West Coast and it was 6 PM for&lt;br /&gt;them.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When I was first accepted to DS they were having major changes in&lt;br /&gt;their structure and my first 9 articles were not paid for. They did&lt;br /&gt;not take ownership of the articles- when I notified them that I had&lt;br /&gt;not received payment I had the option to send in an invoice snail mail&lt;br /&gt;or take back my work. I ended up taking back the work, posted it on&lt;br /&gt;eHow and my revenue has been far more than what I was owed- so it&lt;br /&gt;worked out.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Editorial Staff and Help Desk staff has been nothing but friendly&lt;br /&gt;and helpful since I decided to give DS a chance again. I&#039;m very happy&lt;br /&gt;with them and this is from someone that used to despise the company!&lt;br /&gt;No, I don&#039;t work for them outside of writing, nor am I being asked to&lt;br /&gt;give a good review. I&#039;m just very impressed with how far the company&lt;br /&gt;has come since my first bad experience to change it into a resource&lt;br /&gt;that is a lifesaver when the regular gigs aren&#039;t coming through the&lt;br /&gt;pipe.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You can use my name if you wish.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks,&lt;br /&gt;Julie&#034;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is what I received in response:&lt;br /&gt;&#034;I received soooo many notes about Demand Studios that I must do something I really hate to do....send you a form response. I am so sorry!!! :(&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I am compiling many of the submitted comments and will post them in my article next week. We will not be publishing any names or identifying information.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thank you sooooo much for sending your story to me, Julie! :)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hugs,&lt;br /&gt;Angela&#034;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I may be wrong and missed my email in the bulk of the others posted. It&#039;s possible, but I&#039;m too disappointed in the representation of Deb and the people who choose to work there that I don&#039;t want to bother anymore.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to add: Angela Hoy may have used emails from DS writers, but she did not use the ones that were very positive. I wrote her and did not mention FWJ, Deb, or anyone else. I was a subscriber to Writer&#39;s Weekly, though I won&#39;t be visiting there again. </p>
<p>This was my email- my average per hour has changed since my husband has a new job. It&#39;s far too hard to try to keep up the rate of speed now.</p>
<p>Hi Angela,</p>
<p>I write for Demand Studios. Typically it takes me about an hour to<br />write 2 to 3 How To articles. I&#39;ve recently switched to Fact Sheets<br />and can finish 4 in an hour if I have no distractions. When I&#39;m<br />feeling frisky I can get 20 of either format out in one day. (lots of<br />coffee for that!)</p>
<p>It averages out to around $30 an hour for me.</p>
<p>Demand pays me promptly via Paypal, usually about 6 PM EST. My very<br />first payment was later than that, it came in at 9 PM EST, which was<br />fine with me since DS is located on the West Coast and it was 6 PM for<br />them.</p>
<p>When I was first accepted to DS they were having major changes in<br />their structure and my first 9 articles were not paid for. They did<br />not take ownership of the articles- when I notified them that I had<br />not received payment I had the option to send in an invoice snail mail<br />or take back my work. I ended up taking back the work, posted it on<br />eHow and my revenue has been far more than what I was owed- so it<br />worked out.</p>
<p>The Editorial Staff and Help Desk staff has been nothing but friendly<br />and helpful since I decided to give DS a chance again. I&#39;m very happy<br />with them and this is from someone that used to despise the company!<br />No, I don&#39;t work for them outside of writing, nor am I being asked to<br />give a good review. I&#39;m just very impressed with how far the company<br />has come since my first bad experience to change it into a resource<br />that is a lifesaver when the regular gigs aren&#39;t coming through the<br />pipe.</p>
<p>You can use my name if you wish.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />Julie&quot;</p>
<p>This is what I received in response:<br />&quot;I received soooo many notes about Demand Studios that I must do something I really hate to do&#8230;.send you a form response. I am so sorry!!! 🙁</p>
<p>I am compiling many of the submitted comments and will post them in my article next week. We will not be publishing any names or identifying information.</p>
<p>Thank you sooooo much for sending your story to me, Julie! 🙂</p>
<p>Hugs,<br />Angela&quot;</p>
<p>I may be wrong and missed my email in the bulk of the others posted. It&#39;s possible, but I&#39;m too disappointed in the representation of Deb and the people who choose to work there that I don&#39;t want to bother anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lori		</title>
		<link>https://wordsonpageblog.com/2009/10/content-mills-deb-ng-responds.html#comment-3936</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lori]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loriwidmer.com/wordsonpage/index.php/2009/10/content-mills-deb-ng-responds.html/#comment-3936</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[First post here, Allena.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First post here, Allena.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: allena		</title>
		<link>https://wordsonpageblog.com/2009/10/content-mills-deb-ng-responds.html#comment-3933</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[allena]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loriwidmer.com/wordsonpage/index.php/2009/10/content-mills-deb-ng-responds.html/#comment-3933</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve enjoyed Angela and her site. As in the past I&#039;ve enjoyed you, Deb, and your site. But but but I was very taken back by Angela&#039;s post, as I read it like this &#034;Deb this&#034; and &#034;Deb that.&#034; Quite unprofessional. Now, we all have our unprofessional days. We are human. So, in general, again, and overall, both sites have been helpful to me, and, from what I hear, to my new writers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Oh, and Lori, sorry, I missed it in the comments where you already sort of addressed web content, content mills, pay etc.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve enjoyed Angela and her site. As in the past I&#39;ve enjoyed you, Deb, and your site. But but but I was very taken back by Angela&#39;s post, as I read it like this &quot;Deb this&quot; and &quot;Deb that.&quot; Quite unprofessional. Now, we all have our unprofessional days. We are human. So, in general, again, and overall, both sites have been helpful to me, and, from what I hear, to my new writers.</p>
<p>Oh, and Lori, sorry, I missed it in the comments where you already sort of addressed web content, content mills, pay etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Deb		</title>
		<link>https://wordsonpageblog.com/2009/10/content-mills-deb-ng-responds.html#comment-3931</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loriwidmer.com/wordsonpage/index.php/2009/10/content-mills-deb-ng-responds.html/#comment-3931</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Lori,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&#039;m posting this as anonymous as your form wouldn&#039;t allow me to use my name and email, for some reason.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I have been staying out of responding because I don&#039;t want a whole lot of tit for tat and back and forth, but I will say Lisa is correct in that Angela Hoy left out a few details for her convenience.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For example, this is what I originally said in my post on the DS forum regarding Angela Hoy&#039;&#039;s inquiry:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#034;Angela Hoy at WritersWeekly.com is investigating Demand Studios in her series about content writing sites. She&#039;s asking for writers from DS to send her a note detailing how long it takes to write each article, your hourly rate, and in general, if you&#039;re having a positive experience.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Weigh by sending your note to angela@writersweekly.com. &#034;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;and this is what I said at FWJ:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#034;Do you write for Demand Studios? Writer&#039;s Weekly is looking for experiences from DS Writers. Tell your story to angela@writersweekly.com. While I believe everyone should be honest in relaying their experiences, I will say I don&#039;t believe it to be fair to compare DS to sites such as AllVoices and Examiner (previously profiled at Writer&#039;s Weekly) which pay their writers very little residual income. Angela is looking to learn how much you earn and how long it takes you to write each article. She wants to know your hourly rate per article. Edited to add: Please don&#039;t send any more emails regarding DS to Angela Hoy. She&#039;s been inundated with responses and has everything she need&#034;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As Angela has screenshots I&#039;m sure she would agree this is what I originally said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It wasn&#039;t until later that I made a comment that all the disgruntled people were going to come out of the woodwork. As you can see, there&#039;s a difference between what I said and the way Angela Hoy portrayed it. However, I don&#039;t wish to battle Angela Hoy. I&#039;m going to let people draw their own conclusions, as they already have.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I appreciate everyone&#039;s feedback which I&#039;m taking into consideration. I&#039;m only posting this here because most of you have been very respectful and because you actually asked for my side of the story.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lori,</p>
<p>I&#39;m posting this as anonymous as your form wouldn&#39;t allow me to use my name and email, for some reason.</p>
<p>I have been staying out of responding because I don&#39;t want a whole lot of tit for tat and back and forth, but I will say Lisa is correct in that Angela Hoy left out a few details for her convenience.</p>
<p>For example, this is what I originally said in my post on the DS forum regarding Angela Hoy&#39;&#39;s inquiry:</p>
<p>&quot;Angela Hoy at WritersWeekly.com is investigating Demand Studios in her series about content writing sites. She&#39;s asking for writers from DS to send her a note detailing how long it takes to write each article, your hourly rate, and in general, if you&#39;re having a positive experience.</p>
<p>Weigh by sending your note to <a href="mailto:angela@writersweekly.com">angela@writersweekly.com</a>. &quot;</p>
<p>and this is what I said at FWJ:</p>
<p>&quot;Do you write for Demand Studios? Writer&#39;s Weekly is looking for experiences from DS Writers. Tell your story to <a href="mailto:angela@writersweekly.com">angela@writersweekly.com</a>. While I believe everyone should be honest in relaying their experiences, I will say I don&#39;t believe it to be fair to compare DS to sites such as AllVoices and Examiner (previously profiled at Writer&#39;s Weekly) which pay their writers very little residual income. Angela is looking to learn how much you earn and how long it takes you to write each article. She wants to know your hourly rate per article. Edited to add: Please don&#39;t send any more emails regarding DS to Angela Hoy. She&#39;s been inundated with responses and has everything she need&quot;</p>
<p>As Angela has screenshots I&#39;m sure she would agree this is what I originally said.</p>
<p>It wasn&#39;t until later that I made a comment that all the disgruntled people were going to come out of the woodwork. As you can see, there&#39;s a difference between what I said and the way Angela Hoy portrayed it. However, I don&#39;t wish to battle Angela Hoy. I&#39;m going to let people draw their own conclusions, as they already have.</p>
<p>I appreciate everyone&#39;s feedback which I&#39;m taking into consideration. I&#39;m only posting this here because most of you have been very respectful and because you actually asked for my side of the story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lori		</title>
		<link>https://wordsonpageblog.com/2009/10/content-mills-deb-ng-responds.html#comment-3930</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lori]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loriwidmer.com/wordsonpage/index.php/2009/10/content-mills-deb-ng-responds.html/#comment-3930</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Lisa, you may want to be careful calling Angela a liar and accusing her of twisting facts. I would wager she knows how to investigate and report. Her representation included mostly feedback from DS writers. They&#039;re the ones who were unhappy with DS. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And the line in question? When I read it posted elsewhere - yea, it read like it was encouraging people with positive experiences to respond. No, I&#039;m sure Deb didn&#039;t intend it to sound that way. But it did.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lisa, you may want to be careful calling Angela a liar and accusing her of twisting facts. I would wager she knows how to investigate and report. Her representation included mostly feedback from DS writers. They&#39;re the ones who were unhappy with DS. </p>
<p>And the line in question? When I read it posted elsewhere &#8211; yea, it read like it was encouraging people with positive experiences to respond. No, I&#39;m sure Deb didn&#39;t intend it to sound that way. But it did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lori		</title>
		<link>https://wordsonpageblog.com/2009/10/content-mills-deb-ng-responds.html#comment-3929</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lori]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loriwidmer.com/wordsonpage/index.php/2009/10/content-mills-deb-ng-responds.html/#comment-3929</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi, Allena! Thanks for stopping by.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You are correct - that was Angela&#039;s quote in her newsletter last week.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And you&#039;re correct on your assumption - it&#039;s not writing content. It&#039;s writing for content mills that underpay its writers that&#039;s in question.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Allena! Thanks for stopping by.</p>
<p>You are correct &#8211; that was Angela&#39;s quote in her newsletter last week.</p>
<p>And you&#39;re correct on your assumption &#8211; it&#39;s not writing content. It&#39;s writing for content mills that underpay its writers that&#39;s in question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
