<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wordsonpageblog.com/2007/08/supposably-better-then-that-one-of-my.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wordsonpageblog.com/2007/08/supposably-better-then-that-one-of-my.html</link>
	<description>a freelance writing resource.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 14:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Messenger		</title>
		<link>https://wordsonpageblog.com/2007/08/supposably-better-then-that-one-of-my.html#comment-537</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Messenger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 14:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loriwidmer.com/wordsonpage/index.php/2007/08/supposably-better-then-that-one-of-my.html/#comment-537</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You&#039;ve named a lot of my favorite mistakes to hate.  Without putting a lot of thought into it, I&#039;ll name a couple of my biggest pet peeves.  &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;My #1 pet peeve  managed to miss your list but when you see it, I bet you&#039;ll say it was just an oversight: It&#039;s &quot;irregardless&quot;!  This is an especially heinous misuse since &quot;ir&quot; is a prefix meant to reverse the meaning of a word and yet those who use this word, &lt;I&gt;use&lt;/I&gt; it as if it means the same thing as regardless!  Of course, that would mean that ir-regardless would actually mean &lt;I&gt;with&lt;/I&gt; regard!&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I suppose they they think that if irregular is a word, then irregardless must be, too!  What amazes me is how often I hear this used by educated and intelligent people and how often I hear it on the news!  That is probably why it has also come into such regular use because people hear it on the news and assume it is a new word or maybe that they have been saying it wrong.  &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;My other pet peeve is how often people use the wrong word tense such as &quot;seen&quot; in the following sentences:  &quot;I seen that before!&quot;  &quot;I seen him at the store.&quot; If people would stop to think, they might remember that there are three forms of that word, &quot;see&quot;, &quot;saw&quot; and &quot;seen&quot; and that the last one (in this sort of irregular verbs list) is only to be used with a helper such as have, has or had.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I&#039;m sure I could come up with more  if I took time to think about it but these will have to suffice.  I feel better, now!  Thanks!  ;)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve named a lot of my favorite mistakes to hate.  Without putting a lot of thought into it, I&#8217;ll name a couple of my biggest pet peeves.  </p>
<p>My #1 pet peeve  managed to miss your list but when you see it, I bet you&#8217;ll say it was just an oversight: It&#8217;s &#8220;irregardless&#8221;!  This is an especially heinous misuse since &#8220;ir&#8221; is a prefix meant to reverse the meaning of a word and yet those who use this word, <i>use</i> it as if it means the same thing as regardless!  Of course, that would mean that ir-regardless would actually mean <i>with</i> regard!</p>
<p>I suppose they they think that if irregular is a word, then irregardless must be, too!  What amazes me is how often I hear this used by educated and intelligent people and how often I hear it on the news!  That is probably why it has also come into such regular use because people hear it on the news and assume it is a new word or maybe that they have been saying it wrong.  </p>
<p>My other pet peeve is how often people use the wrong word tense such as &#8220;seen&#8221; in the following sentences:  &#8220;I seen that before!&#8221;  &#8220;I seen him at the store.&#8221; If people would stop to think, they might remember that there are three forms of that word, &#8220;see&#8221;, &#8220;saw&#8221; and &#8220;seen&#8221; and that the last one (in this sort of irregular verbs list) is only to be used with a helper such as have, has or had.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure I could come up with more  if I took time to think about it but these will have to suffice.  I feel better, now!  Thanks!  😉</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lori		</title>
		<link>https://wordsonpageblog.com/2007/08/supposably-better-then-that-one-of-my.html#comment-536</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lori]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 14:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loriwidmer.com/wordsonpage/index.php/2007/08/supposably-better-then-that-one-of-my.html/#comment-536</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The sentence ending in a preposition doesn&#039;t get to me all that much, Alicia. I agree it&#039;s wrong, but sometimes it sounds much better. I use my own judgment for those. Isn&#039;t poetic license what writing is all about? (preposition intended) :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sentence ending in a preposition doesn&#8217;t get to me all that much, Alicia. I agree it&#8217;s wrong, but sometimes it sounds much better. I use my own judgment for those. Isn&#8217;t poetic license what writing is all about? (preposition intended) 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: alicia		</title>
		<link>https://wordsonpageblog.com/2007/08/supposably-better-then-that-one-of-my.html#comment-533</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[alicia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loriwidmer.com/wordsonpage/index.php/2007/08/supposably-better-then-that-one-of-my.html/#comment-533</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In addition to every single one you listed, haha, my skin crawls when - &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;- I hear &quot;We was...&quot; or &quot;They was...&quot;&lt;BR/&gt;- I run into &quot;2&quot; for to, two, or too, &quot;u&quot; for you, etc.&lt;BR/&gt;- I see sentences ended with prepositions (unless it&#039;s completely informal).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition to every single one you listed, haha, my skin crawls when &#8211; </p>
<p>&#8211; I hear &#8220;We was&#8230;&#8221; or &#8220;They was&#8230;&#8221;<br />&#8211; I run into &#8220;2&#8221; for to, two, or too, &#8220;u&#8221; for you, etc.<br />&#8211; I see sentences ended with prepositions (unless it&#8217;s completely informal).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lillie Ammann		</title>
		<link>https://wordsonpageblog.com/2007/08/supposably-better-then-that-one-of-my.html#comment-522</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lillie Ammann]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 01:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loriwidmer.com/wordsonpage/index.php/2007/08/supposably-better-then-that-one-of-my.html/#comment-522</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You&#039;ve listed many of my own pet peeves. Unfortunately, they are all too common.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve listed many of my own pet peeves. Unfortunately, they are all too common.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Leigh		</title>
		<link>https://wordsonpageblog.com/2007/08/supposably-better-then-that-one-of-my.html#comment-520</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leigh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 16:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loriwidmer.com/wordsonpage/index.php/2007/08/supposably-better-then-that-one-of-my.html/#comment-520</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[That show has a lot of good purposely-written errors in grammar/word choice, but I can&#039;t remember them off the top of my head.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That show has a lot of good purposely-written errors in grammar/word choice, but I can&#8217;t remember them off the top of my head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lori		</title>
		<link>https://wordsonpageblog.com/2007/08/supposably-better-then-that-one-of-my.html#comment-519</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lori]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 15:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loriwidmer.com/wordsonpage/index.php/2007/08/supposably-better-then-that-one-of-my.html/#comment-519</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ostrafied? That sounds like something an Australian bird might suffer from... ;)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ostrafied? That sounds like something an Australian bird might suffer from&#8230; 😉</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Leigh		</title>
		<link>https://wordsonpageblog.com/2007/08/supposably-better-then-that-one-of-my.html#comment-518</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leigh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 14:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loriwidmer.com/wordsonpage/index.php/2007/08/supposably-better-then-that-one-of-my.html/#comment-518</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Haha, prostrate vs. prostate reminds me of some of the funny lines on The Sopranos.  &quot;I&#039;m prostate with grief here!&quot; and &quot;Ever since I stopped drinking, I&#039;ve been ostrafied&quot; (instead of ostracized).  &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;My recent pet peeves are people who use picture in place of pitcher; the express line sign that says, &quot;ten items or less&quot; since it should be &quot;ten items or fewer&quot;; and plane used instead of plain.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I edited a doc the other day and the author must have been in the bathroom when his English teacher was working on subject-verb agreement and dangling modifiers.  At the end of every other sentence, I found myself wondering, &quot;WHO/WHAT is he talking about?!&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, prostrate vs. prostate reminds me of some of the funny lines on The Sopranos.  &#8220;I&#8217;m prostate with grief here!&#8221; and &#8220;Ever since I stopped drinking, I&#8217;ve been ostrafied&#8221; (instead of ostracized).  </p>
<p>My recent pet peeves are people who use picture in place of pitcher; the express line sign that says, &#8220;ten items or less&#8221; since it should be &#8220;ten items or fewer&#8221;; and plane used instead of plain.</p>
<p>I edited a doc the other day and the author must have been in the bathroom when his English teacher was working on subject-verb agreement and dangling modifiers.  At the end of every other sentence, I found myself wondering, &#8220;WHO/WHAT is he talking about?!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
